Wouldn't a smaller 90* fitting (reduced from the 1" drain box hole) coming out of the air box worK? Water would drain but the hot air would stay out..?
Those parts are available at any auto parts or hardware store.
Wouldn't a smaller 90* fitting (reduced from the 1" drain box hole) coming out of the air box worK? Water would drain but the hot air would stay out..?
Those parts are available at any auto parts or hardware store.
I wanted to tabulate the readings I've been able to take so far. All of these attempt to be as scientific as possible, even down to the same stretch of road for running and same parking spot / direction for idling. There are a lot of moving variables when measuring IAT!
Sheild Results Idle vs 40 mph.jpg
Dynaliner is on order for mine as well...should have it by Friday.
I've logged a lot of data on my car as well (not nearly as scientific though), and it does make a substantial difference. I think the Dynaliner will have a large impact on keeping the thorough heat soaking due to the radiator fans blasting the airbox and heat shield to a minimum, as shown by your results. Once those fans start going, it is game over for your IATs.
Yes this is true. Many of these idle results included "fan blasts" which caused a quick increase in IAT. The dynaliner definitely helped in this regard, slowing the IAT rise to a creep during the fan blasts in my observations. Interestingly, two layers of Dynaliner on the bottom of the shield yieled no improvement over a single layer. For instructions on my Dynaliner process, see the updated file below:
http://dougshelbyengineering.com/upl...hield_Rev2.pdf
By the way, the next batch of heat shields will be taken to be ceramic coated on Friday.
Last edited by SSGNRDZ_28; 07-22-2015 at 03:10 PM.
Thanks for all the research Doug...!
Great research, Doug! I'm purchasing some Dynaliner now. I need all I can get here in FL.
Doug, you are awesome! Thank you for your research.
Dynaliner on order!
I insulated the bottom of my heat shield in my 15 TA with some reflective insulation I had. It could have been the Dynaliner but I don't remember. It was from Summit. I also installed the nipple thing. Either way, it dramatically improved IATs. I was consistently running 9-11 degrees above ambient even when beating the hell out of the car on the track yesterday. Now coolant temps, they were a different story. They were running 240+. Not good but despite the high coolant temps the IATs stayed low.
Thanks for the update, sounds like a good result.
I just received the sample alternative drain plugs and think they will work well. They can be cut open or left closed depending on what the user wants. Will post photos soon. I think they are only available in bulk but will probably include them in future shield orders and ship them out with the Gen V thumb screws if desired.
Photos of the alternative plug solution... to be included in new heat shield orders and upcoming shipment of Gen V thumb screws.
IMG_6809.jpgIMG_6810.jpg
And updated instructions (page 5)
http://dougshelbyengineering.com/upl...hield_Rev3.pdf
Last edited by SSGNRDZ_28; 07-27-2015 at 08:37 AM.
Looks like the perfect solution. Great find!
Thanks! Very helpful as I was having a lot of trouble finding any
Just installed one of Doug's shields this morning, very nice piece of engineering Doug, fit and finish were top notch, I wont have any reservations offering these to my clients.
I am confused about ordering. Does the $425 kit have everything I need to install or do I need to add the drain plug, and bolts etc?
I have really enjoyed reading about the analysis of the IATs how SSGNRDZ developed the heat shield. Fascinating stuff. Basic questions....how much actual horsepower am I losing when timing is pulled and if I don't go to the drag strip or spends lots of time idling in traffic....would I really notice a big difference in performance? Thanks
The first time I noticed an issue was a couple years ago before I even had a remote understanding of how the Viper PCM works. I was sitting at a traffic light on a hot summer day waiting to be able to turn to get on the interstate...when I went to give it hell on the on-ramp in 2nd gear, the car basically fell on its face and felt like I was dragging a boat anchor behind me. If I had to guess, I was down at least 50HP for it to be that noticeable...fast forward another year when I got my hands on HPTuners, and I figured out that given the conditions, the PCM was likely pulling anywhere between 8-12 degrees of timing due to high IATs. At peak torque (between 4,800-5,000 RPMs), the Gen 4 and Gen 5 calibrations call for about 18° of timing, so with the IAT modifier pulling 8°-12° of that out, you are looking commanding between 8°-10° of timing at that point, and that's really low. An otherwise stock Gen 4/5 car can handle anywhere from 22°-24° of timing at peak torque...that's actually where most of your power gains come from with a tune. Additionally, if the PCM pulls timing, it also adds fuel as an extra safety measure, so not only will you be running very low timing values, you'll also be running rich.
Let the car sit for a few minutes (at least until the radiator fans kick on) and let everything get hot, and then try doing a good 2nd gear pull right after that (now is a great time of year to try this). I'm guessing you'll notice a difference in how hard it pulls when the car is hot.
Arent any of you concerned with the engine hydrolocking if you completely blockoff the drain nipple?
why not just extend it with silicone tubing and route to the bottom of the engine bay?
Bookmarks