Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32
  1. #1
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Katy, TX
    Posts
    520

    MP4-12C vs Gen V



    The Viper did really well if you ask me. I think if the ACR can lose 200 lbs it would've been even. It's hard to hang with the McLaren as light as it is. This shows the Gen V has plenty of power and SRT's focus IMO should be on weight.

  2. #2
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The True North Strong and Free Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,635
    Well, to be honest the McLaren is 3200lbs which is not much heavier than the Viper. drivers weight would make more the difference there. The motor is 616 Twin turbos and 443ftlbs torque. With those stats, the Viper on paper shows better numbers. Most of the power from the McLaren though comes at 2000 rpms, that is from a car that red lines a just over 8000 rpm's and only a 3.8 liter motor. Not bad at all !
    The twin turbos is the big difference here.

    Don't forget the McLaren flirts with a 220,000 dollar price tag. almost double the Vipers. Those days of comparing the Viper with the big boys and coming out on top are gone. The Viper is now among its own level of play. The gap between them and the super exotics is back to normal again. Back in the 90's other than one or two other half million dollar autos, the Viper ruled the planet.

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The land of two incarcerated governors
    Posts
    623
    Just to stay within sight of the MP4-12C is a feat alone. That car is no joke, almost engineering perfection.

  4. #4
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    The McLaren runs mid 10's and traps 135mph stock in the quarter. This is similar to a gen 4 with headers, ported intake, Mopar ECU, no cats, and cat back.

    Just to put things in perspective.

  5. #5
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Tysons Corner, VA
    Posts
    4,676
    The McLaren is a mean machine. The suspension is what is killer with it, allowing it to run 10's all day long.

    More so, McLaren is where SRT needs to be going as a whole. A racing program that generates awesome road cars. Their dealer network is small, but their dealers do what is needed to close sales. From test drives to letting people take cars home overnight to see if they like them.

    I enjoyed driving it, but I can see how it would get "boring" after awhile. Much like the GT-R, it is just too well refined all around, IMHO.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Raleigh
    Posts
    298
    The transmission in the McLaren is what killse the Viper. Everytime the Viper shifts it loses ground.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Next Phase View Post
    The transmission in the McLaren is what killse the Viper. Everytime the Viper shifts it loses ground.
    You sir, are right !

  8. #8
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Katy, TX
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by slitherv10 View Post
    Well, to be honest the McLaren is 3200lbs which is not much heavier than the Viper. drivers weight would make more the difference there. The motor is 616 Twin turbos and 443ftlbs torque. With those stats, the Viper on paper shows better numbers. Most of the power from the McLaren though comes at 2000 rpms, that is from a car that red lines a just over 8000 rpm's and only a 3.8 liter motor. Not bad at all !
    The twin turbos is the big difference here.

    Don't forget the McLaren flirts with a 220,000 dollar price tag. almost double the Vipers. Those days of comparing the Viper with the big boys and coming out on top are gone. The Viper is now among its own level of play. The gap between them and the super exotics is back to normal again. Back in the 90's other than one or two other half million dollar autos, the Viper ruled the planet.
    McLaren weighs 200 lbs less than the Viper and that's before lightweight factory options from McLaren. Compare dry weight to dry weight and it is close to 300 lbs. Big difference.

    http://media.mclarenautomotive.com/release/70/

  9. #9
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    1,973
    Straight line is one thing but I haven't driven with a McClaren on the road course yet that can keep up with the Viper. I can read Road and Track to know who will win in a straight line but at the road course, driver's skill plays a bigger role.

  10. #10
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Tysons Corner, VA
    Posts
    4,676
    In the end, I really don't get the point of comparing cars like this to the Viper.

    The 12C is fantastic all around. But, lets be fair - it requires very little skill to do 10 second launches in it. It is point and shoot and done. Where, if you are into dragging, you have to have skill and learn to launch a manual like the Viper. To me, that seems more rewarding.

    The "It'll run 10's all day long" is nice, but if you are into the "sport" of drag racing, isn't that a bit of a snooze fest?

    I think the Viper needs DCT to compete in the future, but I think the Viper will lose a bit of its soul doing so.

  11. #11
    Moderator
    plumcrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    ALL OVER
    Posts
    3,011
    great street racing car.... love it !
    THE IGNORE FEATURE WORKS, TRY IT...

  12. #12
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperSmith View Post

    I think the Viper needs DCT to compete in the future, but I think the Viper will lose a bit of its soul doing so.
    Maybe so, but if they do, might as well go all the way, and throw in seat and wheel warmers...I'm freezing my butt off here today

  13. #13
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The True North Strong and Free Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,635
    Quote Originally Posted by mnc2886 View Post
    McLaren weighs 200 lbs less than the Viper and that's before lightweight factory options from McLaren. Compare dry weight to dry weight and it is close to 300 lbs. Big difference.

    http://media.mclarenautomotive.com/release/70/
    So the new Viper weighs 3400 lbs? If your stating that the McLaren weighs 200 lbs less than the viper before adding the options, then it must be a smaller difference no? I also stated that drivers weight in the video would make the difference as well. As does the amount of gas each car had as well and if there was a passenger in either car. If I weigh 260lbs and you weigh 160 and I have a quarter tank gas and you have a full tank as well as a passenger, that race would not say a thing as far as who was faster. Drivers race as well at that level of play. these guys I'm guessing were not professionals either.
    Anyway, facts are facts, the McLaren is a much faster car form here to there when put under the same circumstances. Again , comparing a car that is almost twice the cost of a Viper is not apples to apples comparison.

  14. #14
    that McLaren weighed in at 3,118 pounds at the track without driver.... snoozefest? it's a rocket, 0-60 in 2.8, 0-100 in 6 flat with no AWD... very comfortable in normal modes, and a monster in track modes...
    Last edited by FikseGTS; 11-24-2013 at 05:50 PM.

  15. #15
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,280
    Quote Originally Posted by slitherv10 View Post
    Anyway, facts are facts, the McLaren is a much faster car form here to there when put under the same circumstances. Again , comparing a car that is almost twice the cost of a Viper is not apples to apples comparison.
    I always love it when "they" compare the Viper with others costing 50-100% more. NOT

  16. #16
    it's ok to compare the Viper to a more expensive car when it wins though?


    Quote Originally Posted by Space Truckin View Post
    I always love it when "they" compare the Viper with others costing 50-100% more. NOT

  17. #17
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Tysons Corner, VA
    Posts
    4,676
    Quote Originally Posted by FikseGTS View Post
    that McLaren weighed in at 3,118 pounds at the track without driver.... snoozefest? it's a rocket, 0-60 in 2.8, 0-100 in 6 flat with no AWD... very comfortable in normal modes, and a monster in track modes...
    You missed the point.

  18. #18
    I don't think so.... you keep shifting and I'll keep winning... J/K... I have fast manual cars as well and the 12C is no snoozefest when compared to them...


    Quote Originally Posted by ViperSmith View Post
    You missed the point.

  19. #19
    The McLaren is just so badass! I see them around my hood all day long. Really modern. I just give them a thumbs up and go on my way. I can hardly wait to see the P1...

  20. #20
    Ahhh the 2 second club: MP4, Aventador, GT-R, 918, makes 0-60 mph in mid to low 3's seem a bit slow and outdated even though that's plenty fast

  21. #21
    Its just nice to have the practicality of taking a Viper to the local dodge/SRT dealer for service. Try to find a Mc dealer while driving cross country and having an issue. Then all of a sudden those few seconds do not matter any more.

  22. #22
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,005
    Some of you guys take these comparisons too seriously. The MP4 is a fast car, the outcome was as expected. I don't get into the whole "bang for the buck" nonsense arguments when we are discussing cars that are both over six figures pricing. Discount chatter doesn't apply to either of these cars. Just respect them for what each of them are.

  23. #23
    It is what it is, the viper is NOT what it was in 96 when the GTS came out and it destroyed the competition.
    For that to happen today it needs 700+ hp, 3200 lb, and 7k rpm red line from the factory.

    Motor has a lot of potential, shame you can tune it and a simple KN filter puts it on Low power mode. If the Beast could be awaken, the Gen V would be perfect.
    If you could make 800-900 rwh with a bolt on TT or SC system in the same price range as a Gen 2, then it would not matter how it compares stock.

  24. #24
    Brooks, can the McLaren be modified for more power? How is the aftermarket on them?

  25. #25
    there are some exhaust systems out and apparently some tunes out there, I've seen video of a 2013 12C Spider with a tune walking by my friends 12C coupe...

    there are also rumors that the 2015 12C will have 650HP and they will upgrade the older cars as well...


    Quote Originally Posted by v10tt View Post
    Brooks, can the McLaren be modified for more power? How is the aftermarket on them?


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •