The Viper did really well if you ask me. I think if the ACR can lose 200 lbs it would've been even. It's hard to hang with the McLaren as light as it is. This shows the Gen V has plenty of power and SRT's focus IMO should be on weight.
The Viper did really well if you ask me. I think if the ACR can lose 200 lbs it would've been even. It's hard to hang with the McLaren as light as it is. This shows the Gen V has plenty of power and SRT's focus IMO should be on weight.
Well, to be honest the McLaren is 3200lbs which is not much heavier than the Viper. drivers weight would make more the difference there. The motor is 616 Twin turbos and 443ftlbs torque. With those stats, the Viper on paper shows better numbers. Most of the power from the McLaren though comes at 2000 rpms, that is from a car that red lines a just over 8000 rpm's and only a 3.8 liter motor. Not bad at all !
The twin turbos is the big difference here.
Don't forget the McLaren flirts with a 220,000 dollar price tag. almost double the Vipers. Those days of comparing the Viper with the big boys and coming out on top are gone. The Viper is now among its own level of play. The gap between them and the super exotics is back to normal again. Back in the 90's other than one or two other half million dollar autos, the Viper ruled the planet.
Just to stay within sight of the MP4-12C is a feat alone. That car is no joke, almost engineering perfection.
The McLaren runs mid 10's and traps 135mph stock in the quarter. This is similar to a gen 4 with headers, ported intake, Mopar ECU, no cats, and cat back.
Just to put things in perspective.
The McLaren is a mean machine. The suspension is what is killer with it, allowing it to run 10's all day long.
More so, McLaren is where SRT needs to be going as a whole. A racing program that generates awesome road cars. Their dealer network is small, but their dealers do what is needed to close sales. From test drives to letting people take cars home overnight to see if they like them.
I enjoyed driving it, but I can see how it would get "boring" after awhile. Much like the GT-R, it is just too well refined all around, IMHO.
The transmission in the McLaren is what killse the Viper. Everytime the Viper shifts it loses ground.
McLaren weighs 200 lbs less than the Viper and that's before lightweight factory options from McLaren. Compare dry weight to dry weight and it is close to 300 lbs. Big difference.
http://media.mclarenautomotive.com/release/70/
Straight line is one thing but I haven't driven with a McClaren on the road course yet that can keep up with the Viper. I can read Road and Track to know who will win in a straight line but at the road course, driver's skill plays a bigger role.
In the end, I really don't get the point of comparing cars like this to the Viper.
The 12C is fantastic all around. But, lets be fair - it requires very little skill to do 10 second launches in it. It is point and shoot and done. Where, if you are into dragging, you have to have skill and learn to launch a manual like the Viper. To me, that seems more rewarding.
The "It'll run 10's all day long" is nice, but if you are into the "sport" of drag racing, isn't that a bit of a snooze fest?
I think the Viper needs DCT to compete in the future, but I think the Viper will lose a bit of its soul doing so.
great street racing car.... love it !
THE IGNORE FEATURE WORKS, TRY IT...
So the new Viper weighs 3400 lbs? If your stating that the McLaren weighs 200 lbs less than the viper before adding the options, then it must be a smaller difference no? I also stated that drivers weight in the video would make the difference as well. As does the amount of gas each car had as well and if there was a passenger in either car. If I weigh 260lbs and you weigh 160 and I have a quarter tank gas and you have a full tank as well as a passenger, that race would not say a thing as far as who was faster. Drivers race as well at that level of play. these guys I'm guessing were not professionals either.
Anyway, facts are facts, the McLaren is a much faster car form here to there when put under the same circumstances. Again , comparing a car that is almost twice the cost of a Viper is not apples to apples comparison.
that McLaren weighed in at 3,118 pounds at the track without driver.... snoozefest? it's a rocket, 0-60 in 2.8, 0-100 in 6 flat with no AWD... very comfortable in normal modes, and a monster in track modes...
Last edited by FikseGTS; 11-24-2013 at 05:50 PM.
The McLaren is just so badass! I see them around my hood all day long. Really modern. I just give them a thumbs up and go on my way. I can hardly wait to see the P1...
Ahhh the 2 second club: MP4, Aventador, GT-R, 918, makes 0-60 mph in mid to low 3's seem a bit slow and outdated even though that's plenty fast
Its just nice to have the practicality of taking a Viper to the local dodge/SRT dealer for service. Try to find a Mc dealer while driving cross country and having an issue. Then all of a sudden those few seconds do not matter any more.
Some of you guys take these comparisons too seriously. The MP4 is a fast car, the outcome was as expected. I don't get into the whole "bang for the buck" nonsense arguments when we are discussing cars that are both over six figures pricing. Discount chatter doesn't apply to either of these cars. Just respect them for what each of them are.
It is what it is, the viper is NOT what it was in 96 when the GTS came out and it destroyed the competition.
For that to happen today it needs 700+ hp, 3200 lb, and 7k rpm red line from the factory.
Motor has a lot of potential, shame you can tune it and a simple KN filter puts it on Low power mode. If the Beast could be awaken, the Gen V would be perfect.
If you could make 800-900 rwh with a bolt on TT or SC system in the same price range as a Gen 2, then it would not matter how it compares stock.
Brooks, can the McLaren be modified for more power? How is the aftermarket on them?
Bookmarks