And Obama rules certain AR ammo banned.
The end is near...
And Obama rules certain AR ammo banned.
The end is near...
I'm starting to think that he is not going to leave when his term is up. I mean, who is going to stop him? lol
They are voting on Internet providers (Comcast, AT&T, etc...) having the ability to slow down your internet speed depending on what sites you visit. So say YouTube doesn't pay Comcast a fee, Comcast will slow down your connection to them. I don't think that is right. I pay for a connection, I want it fast for all sites. Not just Comcast approved sites.
Comcast is just an example.
That is like blaming GWB for all the decisions the Supreme Court makes because Roberts is the Chief Justice. Some decisions the Supremes make will make the left happy, and others to the right, but I think Roberts is genuinely independent now.
Tom Wheeler is the Chairman of the FCC appointed by Obama, but really the Internet regulation by the FCC was really brought to a head by the Verizon in 2010, which tried to really push the dial the other way, and Verizon was told by AT&T, of all companies, not to rock the boat because it would lead to even more trouble. And it did, for the corporations. I think Wheeler is trying to do the right thing as well here, and it's not a higher taxes thing but a 'foxes running the henhouse is bad' kind of thing.
http://bgr.com/2014/11/25/verizon-fc...ality-lawsuit/
Some good background on what the rules entail:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2015...ime-explained/
http://arstechnica.com/business/2015...-and-title-ii/
By the way, if you think internet speed is all this is about you are kidding yourself. FCC chairman said they want to regulate it like a utility. In other words, taxes, taxes and more taxes...
What I want to know is - can I still get porn??????? LOL!
Want an example of internet controlled by the government? See China and North Korea. Who wants that?
The Internet was controlled by the US government already, but they gave that up last year.
http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles...peech-internet
Net neutrality is primarily about who has the rights to the last mile traffic to your house. The providers (usually large cable corporations and phone companies) want to be the gatekeepers of the speed of the traffic to your house, depending on what the protocol is or where it originates from.
As the purchaser of their service, people generally want to use what they use, and they want to be the ones who determine how fast that a specific website service gets to them.
Basically the ISPs want to control how fast something like netflix or bittorrent comes to you, when basically a data packet is a data packet. As incumbents in specific regions you will not have any choice if they decide to do this (limited ISPs in regions), so the gatekeeper ISP is going to look at the traffic going across to you and slow down service if you (or the originator) doesn't pay extra. The flip side of this is that you can pay extra to get extra speed out of certain protocols or websites too (preferential treatment like a hybrid in an HOV lane).
These should all be non starters because the subscriber to the service (i.e., the consumer browsing the web) should be the one who decides, not the government or the ISP. Net neutrality provides the framework so a civil internet can happen. Removing that protection actually balkanizes the internet because *every* road becomes in effect, a toll road. If that happens you basically kiss small challengers to any high bandwidth popular service goodbye (removing competition because they cannot afford the preferential charges that are being charged to cross their network.
Companies like Level3 communications and other backbone providers will also be allowed to relegate netflix, FaceTime, or any other identifiable traffic to the slow lane unless the consumer or the originators cough up money. It would allow your ISP to slow down transfers from websites they don't like, and increase speeds to ones they do.
This whole fight happened because Verizon got greedy and tried to push the Internet out of a fairly decent place in jurisdiction and legality. Even other ISPs told them not to do it. Verizon won the battle but lost the war because it opened up a whole can of worms that no other corporation wanted, and now all they can claim is that government is bad to regulate the internet because government is bad by definition somehow...even though the government was regulating the whole thing before and it was running pretty well.
Big government is bad period. Our president said the new health care bill would lower costs by $2,500 per year for Americans, yeah right. Mine went from $400 per year to $700.00 per year within 8 months of that bill being passed. No new sickness, don't hardly use the insurance. You wait and see, there is going to be new taxes on internet service just for starters.
But all the sick bastards in your country who had retardedly high premiums went down probably. Don't you get a warm fuzzy feeling knowing you are helping those people by paying their premiums for them? :roll eyes: 700$ is pretty damn good though when you think about it. Up here I pay roughly 32,000$ a year for healthcare. But hey it's "Free healthcare", since I don't get an actual healthcare bill, roll my eyes once more. People are so naive in Canada.
Last edited by Viktimize; 02-27-2015 at 05:34 PM.
Are they going to slow down my, ummm, research sites I go to late at night?
If they decide against network neutrality, for sure they could, because all packets going to you would be going through a deep packet inspector to try and find out where the packet came from, what it does, and most importantly, how much money they can get from you for it.
I'd bundle it together like those idiotic cable/satellite packages so you'd have to pay in order to get "priority access" to important sites like the huffingtonpost™, match.com™, CNN™ and xHamster...only an extra $2.99 per month! Add $1.99 per month for Netflix™ gold streaming today, with speedy access to Disney™ and ESPN.com™! Only an extra $0.99 per month for a 'privacy shield' to exclude your browsing history from being listed on your monthly statement.
By the way, I just heard that the so called 5 million illegals are going to get 4 years of tax credits once they get their SS #'s. So they will be able to file 4 years on back taxes and write off all the childrens which equals a tax refund for 4 years.
Only in America...
I've never read such stupidity on this forum.....i'm sure my IQ has dropped a few points thanks to you guys.
Bookmarks