Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    How much HP gain

    I have a gen 1 and am thinking about replacing stock throttle bodies with a set or 70mm bodies. I would also put on straight tubes and K&H bullet filters. How much of a realistic hp gain would this give me. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Millersville, PA
    Posts
    577
    5-10hp if that.

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Copperopolis, CA
    Posts
    320
    I know these are Gen II comparisons, but should be close. Chrysler rated the ACRs with a 10 hp increase over the standard Vipers and they simply changed over to smooth tubes, and a friend of mine did a dyno comparison with simply changing out the air filter with a K&N filter and picked up 11 wheel hp. So with what you are planning on changing I would think over 30 hp gain is possible.

  4. #4
    I guess it would be worth doing anyway. If nothing else I should get a better fuel mixture ratio.

  5. #5
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Texas City, Texas
    Posts
    291
    I put 65 mm throttlebodies on my 95 but I did head work at the same time. Without head work I doubt you will gain much hp. Another problem is that the holes in the intake manifold where the throttlebodies mount aren't even big enough for 65mm's. You will have to open up the intake to match the larger throttlebodies. My Gen.1 after headwork etc. made 498 rwhp.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Wappingers Falls, NY
    Posts
    276
    Be careful, I don't think the "better air-fuel ratio" is a given. Larger TBs will be open at a smaller angle for the same air flow. That means the throttle position sensor will think "more closed" but the larger opening will be doing "more air." And a Gen 1 is sensitive to this because the right side TB doesn't have a position sensor, so any mis-timing of their openings induces the hi-ho cowboy bucking at low speeds. Some people wonder why their driveability gets worse with larger TBs(even if peak HP is greater) and I think it's because the ECU has trouble resolving the new air flow vs. angle. IMHO, of course.

  7. #7
    hi-ho cowboy bucking at low speeds
    LOL, that is one way to describe it, I remember the first time that happened....ahhh, memories

  8. #8
    Moderator
    plumcrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    ALL OVER
    Posts
    3,011
    you might even lose HP.
    THE IGNORE FEATURE WORKS, TRY IT...

  9. #9
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    671
    On an otherwise stock engine, larger TBs are often more trouble than they're worth. The smooth tubes and K&Ns will net bigger gains than bigger TBs, and without the possible loss of drivability. Save the TBs for if/when you do some engine work.

  10. #10
    Good advice. I think I will just go with tubes and filters. Thanks Guys.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Bugman Jeff View Post
    On an otherwise stock engine, larger TBs are often more trouble than they're worth. er TBs, and without the possible loss of drivability. Save the
    What about if you have headers, hi-flow cats, cat back and R&R's?

  12. #12
    Moderator
    plumcrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    ALL OVER
    Posts
    3,011
    sybil, same thing, you will lose power. A guy i know (JD) tested it on a fully built motor with a paxton and he still lost power
    THE IGNORE FEATURE WORKS, TRY IT...

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by plumcrazy View Post
    sybil, same thing, you will lose power. A guy i know (JD) tested it on a fully built motor with a paxton and he still lost power
    Just wondering for I see those bigger throttle bodies for sale used from time to time.


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •