Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Tech Team

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Santa Monica Ca
    Posts
    819

    SPT 8200rpm Gen 4 dry sump engines

    We just finished another ACRX race motor and were able to correct some valvetrain issues we have had on the production ACRX build, as well as find the HP limit of these motors with the Mopar VVT cam.

    In the past, we have had lifter and camshaft failures, in as little as 1 season. If these engines are run consistently between 5500 and 6500 rpm in race conditions, they experience valve float and can damage the lifters and cam.

    The VVT system on the Gen 4-5 engine is limited by valve spring pressure. Too much pressure and the VVT will not function properly, too little and they go into valve float.

    In order to run more spring pressure and still use the VVT system we made some major modifications to the valvetrain and heads. This included custom short travel lifters, stronger pushrods, lighter valves and shaft mounted rocker arms. The bottom end was built to motorsports specification with a nitrated crankshaft, better rods, pistons and bearings. The end result was an engine that will rev to 8200rpm without any durability issues.

    We added a dry sump system to reduce windage, increase oil volume and give us the ability to adjust the oil pressure perfectly for the VVT system.
    We did quite a bit of work to the heads, adding beryllium valve seats for heat transfer and extensive porting. It turns out that there are limited gains from porting with the stock camshaft, the stock heads can support 800hp, but with porting we can get more power, even with the stock VVT. Raising the compression for race fuel only, we hit the hp wall at 715hp with the stock VVT cam. We could run more lift and much more compression, but without a cam profile change I would doubt we will see more than 20hp. In the future we plan to regrind the VVT cam for more power or go with a single profile VVT delete cam for big numbers. Sticking with a modified VVT is really neat project for a track car as the this cam gives a really smooth torque curve without the big dip around 4-5000rpm, which we see on all the single profile cams.

    Dry sump 1.jpgDRy Sump 2.jpgDRy sump 3.jpgDRy sump 4.jpg

    Torque output from a VVT cam from 1000 to 3000 rpm beats anything a single profile can do, with a modified VVT profile torque could be optimized through a 8000 rpm range, that's a really wide power band!!

    I hope this is interesting to those thinking of making Gen 4-5 modifications or building a competition engine.
    Last edited by Dan Cragin; 07-30-2014 at 02:15 AM.

  2. #2
    Very nice! Can you post some dyno graphs showing the tq curve up to 8000rpm? Also, who made the dry sump set up? Thanks!

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,005
    Thanks for sharing, and doing the experimenting. Any vids of the engine at max RPM? What does it sound like?

    Tony

  4. #4
    Tech Team

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    284
    @8200 rpm I'm subscribed..

  5. #5
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
    Thanks for sharing, and doing the experimenting. Any vids of the engine at max RPM? What does it sound like?

    Tony
    I would guess a very angry UPS truck...perhaps one that was running late around Christmas time.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    So cool!

  7. #7
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,541
    Damn!

  8. #8
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,677
    This is amazing. What were you using to control the VVT system (tuning)? Im guessing the hp figures quoted were from an engine dyno?

  9. #9
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,256
    Dan, thanks for sharing this information. Can you elaborate on a comment you made regarding oil pressure and the effects it has on the VVT setup? I'm curious about how this system functions in regards to RPM and oil pressure.

    How cool would it be to have a complete top end package consisting of ported heads matched to a nice healthy but driveable street grind VVT cam setup and the associated valvetrain parts and make 700rwhp NA. I would think that even without the dry sump, 7k rpm would be attainable with the proper valvetrain on stock shortblock, right? Thinking out loud, the stock Gen 5 intake is done over about 6000rpm though so some work would likely be needed there.
    Last edited by IndyRon; 07-30-2014 at 10:39 AM.

  10. #10
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    That would be one of the most impressive NA builds to ever hit the streets That being said I bet it will be exspensive as Fug.


    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRon View Post
    Dan, thanks for sharing this information. Can you elaborate on a comment you made regarding oil pressure and the effects it has on the VVT setup? I'm curious about how this system functions in regards to RPM and oil pressure.

    How cool would it be to have a complete top end package consisting of ported heads matched to a nice healthy but driveable street grind VVT cam setup and the associated valvetrain parts and make 700rwhp NA. I would think that even without the dry sump, 7k rpm would be attainable with the proper valvetrain on stock shortblock, right? Thinking out loud, the stock Gen 5 intake is done over about 6000rpm though so some work would likely be needed there.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
    Thanks for sharing, and doing the experimenting. Any vids of the engine at max RPM? What does it sound like?

    Tony

    +1 - that must sound incredible

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M View Post
    I would guess a very angry UPS truck...perhaps one that was running late around Christmas time.
    This made me lol.

  13. #13
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,256
    Quote Originally Posted by FLATOUT View Post
    That would be one of the most impressive NA builds to ever hit the streets That being said I bet it will be exspensive as Fug.
    Probably right about both points....I'm thinking parts plus labor/tuning at less than 10k turn-key would make it really enticing for many gen 4/5 guys. I don't know if that's even in the ballpark though.

  14. #14
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    I agree, these things would haul the mail at that power level especially if we lighten them up a 100lbs or so.

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRon View Post
    Probably right about both points....I'm thinking parts plus labor/tuning at less than 10k turn-key would make it really enticing for many gen 4/5 guys. I don't know if that's even in the ballpark though.

  15. #15
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lyon County Nevada
    Posts
    443
    Dan that is amazing! You guys are the best there is when it comes to Vipers.. Wow..

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by V10LEE View Post
    Dan that is amazing! You guys are the best there is when it comes to Vipers.. Wow..

    +100 ^^^^^^

  17. #17
    Tech Team

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Santa Monica Ca
    Posts
    819
    Thanks for the comments, we cant wait to get this car on the track. Yes, the HP numbers were on the engine dyno. I will see if I can post up the dyno graph. I did not video the engine but will next time. We wont be running this engine over 7200rpm on the track, as it does not make any more power up there because of the cam. We ran it that high on the engine dyno to confirm we had resolved all the valve float issues. Once we get a bigger VVT cam we can get more usable rpm. With the Gen 5 cam and manifold it most likely would have made more power on the top end.

    The dry sump is made by Dailey, same as the GTSR setup. In regards to VVT and oil pressure, if you run more valvespring pressure, you can overcome the hydraulic function of the VVT, with a dry sump, you can change how fast the pump runs and taylor relief springs to get the oil pressure where it needs to for the VVT.

    The G4-5 engines do not suffer from the oiling issues like the earlier engines, so they like rpm. The crankshaft driven front pump has its limitations but 7000rpm should be fine.

    We will be doing another build soon, just as soon as we determine what to do with the camshaft.

  18. #18
    Great work.

    I like to see these kind of builds. I spin my gen4 race motor to 6750 all weekend long.

    I wonder if I'll be racing against this motor at some point.

    - Keith@HPTuners

  19. #19
    I <3 this thread.

  20. #20
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,677
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnus View Post
    I spin my gen4 race motor to 6750 all weekend long.

  21. #21
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    541
    What type of PCM/tuning is used on this engine?

  22. #22
    Tech Team

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Santa Monica Ca
    Posts
    819
    We used an Infinity EMS to tune it on the engine dyno. We would like to use the HP tuners software for the final tune, or we will stick with the Infinity as it interfaces with our Motorsports dash. Maybe Keith might want to share his experience.

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Cragin View Post
    We used an Infinity EMS to tune it on the engine dyno. We would like to use the HP tuners software for the final tune, or we will stick with the Infinity as it interfaces with our Motorsports dash. Maybe Keith might want to share his experience.
    awesome. please keep this thread up to date with developments and offerings as this becomes available. A Viper at 8k RPM would be sick!

  24. #24
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    WIsconsin
    Posts
    687
    That sounds like an unreal motor. Can't wait to see it out there. The V10 block does seem very robust.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M View Post
    I would guess a very angry UPS truck...perhaps one that was running late around Christmas time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Short View Post
    This made me lol.
    Those things already scare me somewhat when i hear them...imagine 4k more rpm (than they are probably turning). Godzilla.


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •