Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 61
  1. #26
    VOA Member 99RT10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Banned
    Posts
    3,325
    Quote Originally Posted by tmcphail View Post
    Its not an issue of what we can increase the actual rev limit to, its more to the point of what should we allow it to be safely. Yes I can set it to 7200 but I don't think its feasible or smart to run it up that high unless you have a purpose built motor for that.
    By expanding the power band to say 7000, it will make this car an unbeatable combination. I would love to see someone push the envelope a little. I wonder where the power would start to drop off. I am betting past 7200.

  2. #27
    Do the Gen IV's oil any better than the gen 3's? If not 6500 could be a grenade in the making. I'd be curious if the peak of your HP/ torque curves move higher (more rpms) with the tuning. If not what are you really accomplishing by the RPM change. Very interested in your results. Glad someone is taking the time to make this work.

  3. #28
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    St. Augustine Florida
    Posts
    365
    Graph is below. From what I have witnessed things start to flatten out above 6250. I don't really think taking it to 7K will be ultimately beneficial on a stock motor.


  4. #29
    The Gen 3's drop off at 5800. What do the Gen IV's drop off at? I would never run a stock motor that high. Their oiling design is just not adequate. You are talking modified motors right?

    Quote Originally Posted by 99RT10 View Post
    By expanding the power band to say 7000, it will make this car an unbeatable combination. I would love to see someone push the envelope a little. I wonder where the power would start to drop off. I am betting past 7200.

  5. #30
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Moon View Post
    Do the Gen IV's oil any better than the gen 3's? If not 6500 could be a grenade in the making. I'd be curious if the peak of your HP/ torque curves move higher (more rpms) with the tuning. If not what are you really accomplishing by the RPM change. Very interested in your results. Glad someone is taking the time to make this work.
    The Mopar PCM rev limit is set to 6,500 (up 100 from the factory rev limit) - I'm guessing this is a safe limit for the car, otherwise the Mopar folks would have left it alone.

    Beyond that is anyone's guess though.

  6. #31
    That's up from the 3's. I think they were 6250 or 6150. I dropped mine to 6000. The car gains nothing past 5800 even with a Paxton so why push it was always my philosophy. Both my tuners agreed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M View Post
    The Mopar PCM rev limit is set to 6,500 (up 100 from the factory rev limit) - I'm guessing this is a safe limit for the car, otherwise the Mopar folks would have left it alone.

    Beyond that is anyone's guess though.

  7. #32
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Lucas, Texas
    Posts
    2,009
    I think it is worth mentioning here that "canned tunes" are not going to be the thing....yet. While Torrie was trying to get my throttle response more crisp, he did note that my 2008 responded totally different to tuning inputs than his 2010 did. Of course we know the 08 had worse throttle lag than than 09 or 10. But so few tunes have been done at this point that a one size fits all approach is likely to not be around for a while.

  8. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by 99RT10 View Post
    By expanding the power band to say 7000, it will make this car an unbeatable combination. I would love to see someone push the envelope a little. I wonder where the power would start to drop off. I am betting past 7200.
    I would bet you will be picking up motor parts before you get to 7200rpm

  9. #34
    Especially number 3 and 4 pistons and rods.

  10. #35
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Moon View Post
    That's up from the 3's. I think they were 6250 or 6150. I dropped mine to 6000. The car gains nothing past 5800 even with a Paxton so why push it was always my philosophy. Both my tuners agreed.
    It really depends on the type of driving you are doing too - on a road course, there is usually no need to tap the rev limiter on every shift, unless you like rebuilding motors. For drag racing though, it isn't so much about how much (or little) you gain beyond a certain RPM point, it is about where you fall back in the power band after the shift. I heard the same argument from the LSx guys back when I was drag racing my Camaro..."it doesn't gain anything past 5,800 RPMs, so I shift right at 5,800 RPMs." The guy that said that couldn't figure out why I was trapping 2 MPH faster than him all day long, both cars bone stock...I shifted as close to 6,200 RPMs as I could.

    More RPMs = more wear and tear though, so there's no free lunch.

  11. #36
    I agree that canned tunes may be ok for a daily driver but they are usually so generic and conservative that there is a ton of potential left out there. I worked with Todd at A&C. He did a great job explaining each separate issue of the tuning process. I also eliminated the Split Second box for tuning and just used SCT.

    Quote Originally Posted by FrgMstr View Post
    I think it is worth mentioning here that "canned tunes" are not going to be the thing....yet. While Torrie was trying to get my throttle response more crisp, he did note that my 2008 responded totally different to tuning inputs than his 2010 did. Of course we know the 08 had worse throttle lag than than 09 or 10. But so few tunes have been done at this point that a one size fits all approach is likely to not be around for a while.

  12. #37
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Downingtown, PA
    Posts
    1,047
    Quote Originally Posted by FrgMstr View Post
    I just got an appointment set today at 4:30 to get a few dyno pulls in over at True Street here in North Texas. w00t!!1
    Can't wait for the results!

  13. #38
    Is it 4:30 yet haha

  14. #39
    Now it is! P.S. Revolution I sent you PM... Let me know. Thanks!

  15. #40
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    Quote Originally Posted by slpfirehawk View Post
    Now it is! P.S. Revolution I sent you PM... Let me know. Thanks!
    Texas is central time

  16. #41
    Dang it! Thanks for heads up. Got too excited

  17. #42
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Moon View Post
    That's up from the 3's. I think they were 6250 or 6150. I dropped mine to 6000. The car gains nothing past 5800 even with a Paxton so why push it was always my philosophy. Both my tuners agreed.
    This defies performance logic. Your Paxton car will be faster, if you shift it at 6200. Centri blower needs rpm, to make more boost / power. I shift my Paxton / built engine at 6400. It is still pulling HARD at that rpm. Plus, when you shift at higher rpm, the next gear starts at a higher rpm.

  18. #43
    VOA Member 99RT10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Banned
    Posts
    3,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Revolution View Post
    I would bet you will be picking up motor parts before you get to 7200rpm
    With the Gen 5's being all forged, you don't think they would last to 7000 RPM?

  19. #44
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Lucas, Texas
    Posts
    2,009
    Well, I hate to disappoint, but it seems after all the racing I have done lately, the clutch decided to give up the ghost on our first run. I couple of good logging runs in to share with Torrie though but the clutch was slipping.

    Stock clutch with 31K miles on it that has suffered through many dig races, roll races, and standing mile runs. Time to call JonB.

  20. #45
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by 99RT10 View Post
    With the Gen 5's being all forged, you don't think they would last to 7000 RPM?
    I'm guessing valve train stability would be more of an issue than whether or not you have forged pistons.

  21. #46
    Moderator
    Viper Girl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,415
    I want to Welcome Torrie as a VOA sponsor... Support your Sponsors guys!

    Thanks Torrie
    Use the Report a post feature... It works!

  22. #47
    Sucks to hear that

  23. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by 99RT10 View Post
    With the Gen 5's being all forged, you don't think they would last to 7000 RPM?
    Try it I guess and find out
    My money is on it won't

  24. #49
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The Western Reserve
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by FrgMstr View Post
    Well, I hate to disappoint, but it seems after all the racing I have done lately, the clutch decided to give up the ghost on our first run. I couple of good logging runs in to share with Torrie though but the clutch was slipping.

    Stock clutch with 31K miles on it that has suffered through many dig races, roll races, and standing mile runs. Time to call JonB.
    #ClutchFail

    Damn..that sucks. Hopefully Jon gets you up and running soon. I expected this thread to explode when you posted.

  25. #50
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    LMAO, dude that sucks but I can't help but laugh as we have been through so many little setbacks with these cars. I blame it on the new power the car is making . All good dude you'll get the new one in and out the numbers up.

    Andy


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •