Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1

    2 Post Lift for Storage

    In a previous thread, I mentioned that I use my 2 post lift for storage. I received some feedback that it may not be the best to let your suspension hang for a long period of time. I'm not completely sure about that, but I decided to talk to a local fab shop for a solution in converting a 2 post lift to a storage lift. I wanted something that I could somewhat easily take off if used the 2 post lift for wheel and suspension work. I did a test fit last night. Here is what we have come up with so far. Seems like it will work out.










  2. #2
    Slight drop when loaded, but this is actually the least drop I have seen in any design that I have found on the internet. Made some wooden ramps to more easily drive on the lift. Any feedback or ideas?

  3. #3
    Design and fab pics:








  4. #4
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,042
    Interesting. Cool design.

    Is the cross bar bolted and welded or just bolted to the wheel buckets? Not sure what else to call the area where the tire is making contact.

  5. #5
    The cross bar is bolted. Large grade 8 bolts. Included this in the design in case I wanted to store a smaller car with less width. Can just bolt up a smaller cross bar and bring swing arms toward the center. I think the single bolted cross bar is where the flex is occurring. Could have welded multiple bars going across with them trussed together. However this would have added a significant weight. As it stands right now, the weight is at the maximum I want to be. Any more would make it difficult to take on/ off.

    I’m planning on getting a structural engineering evaluation to make sure it is good to go before storing or working under this thing.

    I’m not even sure if letting the suspension hang is detrimental.

    Right know this has turned into a science experiment.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,256
    Conceptually I love the idea as a 2-post lift owner. Structurally it may be just fine, but the flex makes me nervous. I don't think I'd work/walk under it until a structural engineer went over it fully. Also, i have offset arms on my lift, the front arms are shorter than the rears. Not sure I have enough reach to make it to both hub centerpoints. Many other 2 post lifts are designed similarly.

  7. #7
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Blair, NE
    Posts
    43
    I have considered this as well, but not sure how necessary it is. Did you look at the wheel lift adapter that Mohawk makes?

    I always take the wheels off, but stored my TA over the top of another car last winter on a two post lift. Also, when not in use, the car is usually on the lift. I don’t think it hurts anything as long as the wheels are off.


    https://mohawklifts.com/automotive-lifts/lift-options/

  8. #8
    Yes I have looked at the Mohawk adapters. However, is has a smaller wheel recommendation, and was not sure if it would work with my wheel sizes.

    I'm not even sure if storing a car on a 2 post lift with wheels on is detrimental. Need to ask an automotive engineer this sometime if I ever run into one.

  9. #9
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Braunfels, TX
    Posts
    1,836
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRon View Post
    Conceptually I love the idea as a 2-post lift owner. Structurally it may be just fine, but the flex makes me nervous. I don't think I'd work/walk under it until a structural engineer went over it fully. Also, i have offset arms on my lift, the front arms are shorter than the rears. Not sure I have enough reach to make it to both hub centerpoints. Many other 2 post lifts are designed similarly.
    While the concept and the execution of the OP's arrangement is really nice, the flexure is troubling with that single strut span. I would recommend either a single 3x3 x 3/8" cross tube for each end with cantilever wheel baskets, or use twin 2x2 x 1/4" cross members for each end. This might be quickest and utilize the existing end assemblies, but a diamond orientation isn't as strong as square. You'll want a nice snug fit for the pin bosses.
    Last edited by GTS Dean; 09-28-2020 at 08:44 AM.

  10. #10
    Whats the thickness of your slab that it bolts too?

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by GTS Dean View Post
    While the concept and the execution of the OP's arrangement is really nice, the flexure is troubling with that single strut span. I would recommend either a single 3x3 x 3/8" cross tube for each end with cantilever wheel baskets, or use twin 2x2 x 1/4" cross members for each end. This might be quickest and utilize the existing end assemblies, but a diamond orientation isn't as strong as square. You'll want a nice snug fit for the pin bosses.
    I agree the flex is something that I am concerned. Definitely don't want it to fatigue one day. While your recommendations may be spot on, I plan on taking everything to a structural engineer to put some numbers to it. If I have to add a lot more weight then I do not see myself using these too much.


    Quote Originally Posted by SRT_BluByU View Post
    Whats the thickness of your slab that it bolts too?
    3/4 " steel plate.

  12. #12
    I was curious what the conc floor slab thickness the lift bolts to is.. id like to get a two post lift but cant find one that works with a 4” thick non-reinforced slab.

  13. #13
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    I'm sorry...but rather than fabricating something like this, you should just get a 4-post.

  14. #14
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,733
    Quote Originally Posted by 13COBRA View Post
    I'm sorry...but rather than fabricating something like this, you should just get a 4-post.
    I was thinking the same, 4 post with bridge jacks (that's what I did). But...I definitely see the allure of the OP's solution with the 2 post.

  15. #15

  16. #16
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperTony View Post
    I was thinking the same, 4 post with bridge jacks (that's what I did). But...I definitely see the allure of the OP's solution with the 2 post.
    I do too...as long as it works 100% of the time...but in reality, if it only works 99% of the time, I'd rather opt for a 4-post.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperTony View Post
    I was thinking the same, 4 post with bridge jacks (that's what I did). But...I definitely see the allure of the OP's solution with the 2 post.
    I have a 4 post lift for storage already. I really like my 2 post lift. Tons more versatile working on the car. A lot more room underneath. As with anything, nature abhors a vacuum. Buy another 4 post lift and it will be filled with something and I imagine I will still be wanting my two post for storage.

    Quote Originally Posted by SRT_BluByU View Post
    I was curious what the conc floor slab thickness the lift bolts to is.. id like to get a two post lift but cant find one that works with a 4” thick non-reinforced slab.
    I have this lift installed in a commercial business park type facility. There are some commercial shops there with Lifts. I had somebody install the lift. They checked for the concrete depth and stated the concrete was good to go. I never checked it myself.
    Last edited by LuvSpeed; 09-29-2020 at 02:55 PM.

  18. #18
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,042
    Why not just put it up with the normal 4 points and remove the wheels?

  19. #19
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by StrokerAce View Post
    Why not just put it up with the normal 4 points and remove the wheels?
    Theory is uncompressed suspensions wear out faster during storage. This is why I am buying a 4 post this fall, despite when I actually work on brakes/suspension the process is more cumbersome.

  20. #20
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,042
    Quote Originally Posted by mackzilla View Post
    Theory is uncompressed suspensions wear out faster during storage. This is why I am buying a 4 post this fall, despite when I actually work on brakes/suspension the process is more cumbersome.
    Wouldn't removing the wheels take most of the weight off the suspension?

    BTW, I agree with your purchase.

    img_20200523_151829027_2c61a94134c49ddc327aa625e1a4d30647a9cda0.jpg

  21. #21
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    South of London, Surrey
    Posts
    7,577
    Nice Idea but I would be slightly concerned of the steel bars running across the tires, I like Deans suggestion of a tire basket , a steel half dish to offset pressure on the tire.

    Looking at the pic with the car in the Air, it looks like there is some strain on the arms trying to tilt inward?
    Last edited by Fatboy 18; 10-02-2020 at 09:55 AM.

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Fatboy 18 View Post
    Nice Idea but I would be slightly concerned of the steel bars running across the tires, I like Deans suggestion of a tire basket , a steel half dish to offset pressure on the tire.

    Looking at the pic with the car in the Air, it looks like there is some strain on the arms trying to tilt inward?
    Valid point. That us why angled to make a diamond shape to lessen the impression on the tire. Steel half dish may be beneficial. Will have to consider changing that as long as it down not add to much weight. Use the current design a make a dish in there. Next step is structural engineering evaluation to make sure is safe. The tilt is concerning. Will keep you posted when structural engineering eval is done and what recs were made.


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •