Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35

Thread: Big Aero

  1. #26
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona Vipers View Post
    I'd have to guess nobody in Global Time Attack or similar programs have access to wind tunnels, it's all done by trial and error with lap times. They obviously know what they are doing.
    The guy that owns this car is a good friend of mine, his shop works on my car, he built all this with his own hands, no wind tunnel, just lap times and his car will smoke mine or any other car on this forum-
    https://motormavens.com/ums-tuning-c...er-lap-battle/
    Sure trial and error could help, but very often they throw a lot of things at the car at once and don't always understand whether a specific mod was actually that helpful. Also as these things individually usually contribute fractions of seconds of improvements or not, variations in atmospheric conditions also may throw off any assessment of aero mods. Thats why wind tunnels are the only standardised way you can tell.

  2. #27
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481
    Quote Originally Posted by stradman View Post
    Sure trial and error could help, but very often they throw a lot of things at the car at once and don't always understand whether a specific mod was actually that helpful. Also as these things individually usually contribute fractions of seconds of improvements or not, variations in atmospheric conditions also may throw off any assessment of aero mods. Thats why wind tunnels are the only standardised way you can tell.
    I guess more than overall lap times, I mean data. Like when I was at COTA a couple years ago, I had the privilege of watching Gspeed and Paul Costas build a front splitter for the infamous "SLJHMR" C5. They spent the entire weekend changing the splitter size using pennies worth of spare junk they had lying around, but made the car much faster. They compare corner speeds and speeds through the S's, versus MPH lost on the straights etc. This car run 2.23 at cota that weekend with 280whp just relying on heavy aero, and light weight. They were 2 second off my stock ACR that weekend and my time broke the Texas Nasa TT1 track record with half the horsepower lol. It's not hard to see what aero changes make your car handle better. It's just like when you change wing settings. Set your wing to #1 and to #4 back to back and you won't need a wind tunnel to know #1 is faster and car is handling better. Cheers

  3. #28
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona Vipers View Post
    I guess more than overall lap times, I mean data. Like when I was at COTA a couple years ago, I had the privilege of watching Gspeed and Paul Costas build a front splitter for the infamous "SLJHMR" C5. They spent the entire weekend changing the splitter size using pennies worth of spare junk they had lying around, but made the car much faster. They compare corner speeds and speeds through the S's, versus MPH lost on the straights etc. This car run 2.23 at cota that weekend with 280whp just relying on heavy aero, and light weight. They were 2 second off my stock ACR that weekend and my time broke the Texas Nasa TT1 track record with half the horsepower lol. It's not hard to see what aero changes make your car handle better. It's just like when you change wing settings. Set your wing to #1 and to #4 back to back and you won't need a wind tunnel to know #1 is faster and car is handling better. Cheers
    This is basically how F1 teams did before windtunnels and stuff.
    And how many amateurs still do it today.

    Not everybody can afford a wind tunnel. And a wind tunnel isn't a must either.
    Can be done the hard way, just way more time consuming and difficult.

  4. #29
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperTim View Post
    This is basically how F1 teams did before windtunnels and stuff.
    And how many amateurs still do it today.

    Not everybody can afford a wind tunnel. And a wind tunnel isn't a must either.
    Can be done the hard way, just way more time consuming and difficult.
    Or like this LOL- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjbhBBJ-mfY

  5. #30
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona Vipers View Post
    Haha I was hoping that's the link you were posting.

  6. #31
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona Vipers View Post
    LMAO exactly what was on my mind while I was typing that!

  7. #32
    Here is probably an even more useful tool to collaborate real world data with what is shown in the wind tunnel or CFD models.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVU1-zSrqvM

    One of the problems with a wind tunnel is just that, a tunnel has a "wall" on the sides and top of the car. On the open track, the car has essentially has no sides or "roof" to limit the compression of the air molecules. The compression of molecules against the walls of a wind tunnel can cause a different effect compared to what the car is doing when it is 100' or further from a fence or track wall, etc.

    Mixing a homebrew of fluorescent powder and a light oil can let you know what the air is actually doing against the car in more real world conditions. Helpful in F1 or other top tier racing where the top three cars may qualify within a hundredth's of a second of each other.

    For me, it would just remind me of a bad LSD trip.

  8. #33
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas/Phoenix
    Posts
    838
    Or you could build your own (95 mph limit - all the tow truck would do) wind tunnel. LOL It isn't very accurate, but it helped me find the clean air for the wing and the really dirty air where the roof met the windshield.

    Pappy

    56 Wind Tunnel.jpg

  9. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Pappy View Post
    Or you could build your own (95 mph limit - all the tow truck would do) wind tunnel. LOL It isn't very accurate, but it helped me find the clean air for the wing and the really dirty air where the roof met the windshield.

    Pappy

    56 Wind Tunnel.jpg
    First ever wind tunnel to get a speeding ticket......lol.

  10. #35
    Member
    Supporting Vendor
    Supporting Vendor
    TKO MOTORSPORTS TEAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    739
    Quote Originally Posted by ACR Steve View Post
    What Stradman said :

    "with any aero mods. Unless you can test the
    car in a proper wind tunnel some of it may not actually be as functional as we think"
    Agreed Steve wind tunnel testing is the best and most cost effective but 500.00 per hour for cheap static wind tunnel testing is not in most amateur racing budgets There are wind tunnel work arounds and good basic aero principals that many of us professionals use that have worked for decades. Alot of these time attack cars could be alot better designed and engineered for sure; But its always good to see people working with what they have and trying things. Professional motorsports use to be about innovation and competition but now its all about homologation.


 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •