![Quote](images/styles/Modern/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Bill Pemberton
Please consider what Jon B is suggesting , and I wish to add another issue. Owners who have decided to go with no cats can run into issues with lower resale as this is one notation on many Dealer Purchase agreements ( consumer statement that the exhaust is intact or items have not been removed ). This is not just in States requiring Emissions testing , it is also listed in many States as removal of a catalytic converter must be listed at an Auction. There is a common sense understanding that converters go bad and at some point need replacing , so the use of a high flow cat has been viewed as a possible replacement. So you not only will have a stinky car , you jeopardize your resale as most Dealers will assess a rather sizable sum to correct exhaust issues.
The other thing , often not commented on , is the motor does benefit from the back pressure with the low end torque , and frankly the secret about the Viper's success over the years has really been about the massive torque and not necessarily the horsepower. It helped the 90s models confuse the skeptics who said a big block, and all the weight up front would not be a solid racecar -- surprise with the major with FIA and the overall win at Daytona in 2000.
Bookmarks