Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 42 of 42
  1. #26
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    616
    ACRGTR, great comparison and I agree with some of this as I sat in one at Daytona for awhile and noticed the interior seemed much more confining and the headroom was very tight compared to my 09 ACR, and that was without a helmet!

  2. #27
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Up The River..[Columbia River Gorge near Portland OR]
    Posts
    3,726
    I really appreciate your comparo, and the fact that it 'inspired' so many other hands-on, real-world inputs. GREAT THREAD.

    [Especially noted is the 'bigger than most' XL-2X comments from another 6'2 '+ 12-pack.]

    DO add some rebound to the ACR...

  3. #28
    I wanna see a gen IV ACR v. Gen V ACR comparison

  4. #29
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Montgomery Texas
    Posts
    6,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Policy Limits View Post
    I wanna see a gen IV ACR v. Gen V ACR comparison
    I think we would all love to see that as well I'm sure once it comes out if the pricing isn't crazy I willbe trying to figure out a way to get one.

  5. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by FLATOUT View Post
    I think we would all love to see that as well I'm sure once it comes out if the pricing isn't crazy I willbe trying to figure out a way to get one.
    That's what I am afraid of... I hope it kicks so much ass, but afraid it will do so I will be tempted to give up my IV ACR... which I don't want to do... and most likely won't be able to have both.. LOL

  6. #31
    Good write up Jeff, maybe we can do some auto-cross or go to VIR soon.

  7. #32
    Hi,

    Looks like you guys should be able to help me. I'm looking to swap out my stock gen3 for a stock gen5. I'm to believe the T56 transmission currently attached to the gen3 should be able to handle the extra bhp and torque when paired to the gen5, although a clutch upgrade may be useful.

    Am I right in thinking the the engine mounts should all be the same?
    And that the gen5 (from a 6 speed manual car - but unfortunately didn't come with the tr-6060 transmission) will pair to the T56 OK?

    And any assistance in what other jobs I'll need to do would be much appreciated. Like - I believe the gen5 throttle is fly by wire - so I guess I'll need to get.
    I only have the wiring loom and ECU from the gen3 - will the sensors and other connections just fit?
    With the gen3 ECU start the engine? I can't damage the engine running the old ECU can I?

    I'll leave it at that for now - any help would be much appreciated.

    Thanks

  8. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by apacheviper View Post
    Hi,

    Looks like you guys should be able to help me. I'm looking to swap out my stock gen3 for a stock gen5. I'm to believe the T56 transmission currently attached to the gen3 should be able to handle the extra bhp and torque when paired to the gen5, although a clutch upgrade may be useful.

    Am I right in thinking the the engine mounts should all be the same?
    And that the gen5 (from a 6 speed manual car - but unfortunately didn't come with the tr-6060 transmission) will pair to the T56 OK?

    And any assistance in what other jobs I'll need to do would be much appreciated. Like - I believe the gen5 throttle is fly by wire - so I guess I'll need to get.
    I only have the wiring loom and ECU from the gen3 - will the sensors and other connections just fit?
    With the gen3 ECU start the engine? I can't damage the engine running the old ECU can I?

    I'll leave it at that for now - any help would be much appreciated.

    Thanks
    You would need to swap out the Gen IV PCM/engine harness/mounts/ radiator fans/ pedal assembly / dash harness etc. Not a cheap or easy option. The Gen 3 stuff will be no good with the IV/V engine.

    Your best bet is to do a Gen IV head swap/Mopar Kit and keep the cable throttle body.

  9. #34
    Wow, didnt realize this thread was bumped from 3 years ago. lol

    What I'd like to see is IV ACR vs TA 2.0 and IV ACR vs V ACR.

    I wish magazine would test the TA 2.0 and find out how much quicker it is around a track compared to the TA 1.0.

  10. #35
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Deadmonton, Albertastan, Canada
    Posts
    1,524
    Nothing is faster than a TA 1....

    NOTHING

  11. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by serpent View Post
    Wow, didnt realize this thread was bumped from 3 years ago. lol
    What I'd like to see is IV ACR vs TA 2.0 and IV ACR vs V ACR.
    The Laguna Seca times pretty much tell the story on these comparo's. 1:28 (Gen V ACR) to 1:33 (2014 TA or Gen IV ACR) is forever.....
    http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna-seca-post-1988

  12. #37
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    592
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJon View Post
    The Laguna Seca times pretty much tell the story on these comparo's. 1:28 (Gen V ACR) to 1:33 (2014 TA or Gen IV ACR) is forever.....
    http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna-seca-post-1988
    Viperjon
    Based on the year that had to be the TA 1.0 and not the 2.0 which has more aero and do you know if they ran the street ACR or the ACRX? I would assume they compare road cars so it should have been the ACR right? Just curious.

  13. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by SilverACR View Post
    Viperjon
    Based on the year that had to be the TA 1.0 and not the 2.0 which has more aero and do you know if they ran the street ACR or the ACRX? I would assume they compare road cars so it should have been the ACR right? Just curious.
    Those times are the TA1 and a stock Gen IV ACR. (This is where the 1:33 edition Gen IV ACR moniker came from).
    I've never seen any times for a TA2 vs TA1 anywhere probably due to so few TA2 sold comparatively.

  14. #39
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    592
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJon View Post
    Those times are the TA1 and a stock Gen IV ACR. (This is where the 1:33 edition Gen IV ACR moniker came from).
    I've never seen any times for a TA2 vs TA1 anywhere probably due to so few TA2 sold comparatively.
    Got it! I would think the TA2 would fall somewhere in between the 5ACR and the 5TA. It would be an interesting comparison if someone has it. Thanks

  15. #40
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    435
    Here's a Gen 5 vs. GEN 4 ACR comparison in a straight line, however irrelevant it may be. Gen 4 has full header and exhaust,, tune, and intake. Gen 5 has headers and arrow pcm. :-)

    https://youtu.be/94dqVdyHgJg

  16. #41
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    592
    Quote Originally Posted by dethred View Post
    Here's a Gen 5 vs. GEN 4 ACR comparison in a straight line, however irrelevant it may be. Gen 4 has full header and exhaust,, tune, and intake. Gen 5 has headers and arrow pcm. :-)

    https://youtu.be/94dqVdyHgJg
    Irrelevant maybe... fun to watch absolutely! To cold to drive mine here in Iowa so this is all I got��LOL

  17. #42
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Rochester Hills, MI & Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,376
    So is the bottom line a TA 2.0 is equal to or quicker than a Gen 4 ACR (obviously around a track)?


 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •