Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 77
  1. #26
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Dana Point
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by SSGNRDZ_28 View Post
    Gauging interest in a carbon fiber belly pan. Would save about 4-5 lbs. Target price is $1350. Let me know if you are interested.

    Thanks
    Doug
    Doug, looks interesting!! I have full CF pan on my comp coupe. Car came from UK and never saw one before. I'll take some pics down the road and send them to you. be nice if you could build a spare and/or make them for some of the other CC guys. thanks!! Mike

  2. #27
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481
    Quote Originally Posted by RedTanRT/10 View Post
    AZ you gotta be kidding me!! Get a real set up

    Attachment 37719

    I'm tempted! The lightest I've found is still going to add about 22 lbs. If i continue using the warmers I probably will, I'm still in the testing phase.

  3. #28
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    Quote Originally Posted by RedTanRT/10 View Post
    Doug, looks interesting!! I have full CF pan on my comp coupe. Car came from UK and never saw one before. I'll take some pics down the road and send them to you. be nice if you could build a spare and/or make them for some of the other CC guys. thanks!! Mike
    Thanks best bet might be to get one in hand but post some pictures.

    For those interested the rear jack point will clamp to the frame. It will spread the load, allow easier jacking while protecting the pan a bit and will also serve to seal that hole for better aero. It will only protrude slightly below the belly pan.

    108DE4FC-55A7-43BA-A750-7E6F74F4759E.jpg

  4. #29
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,733
    Quote Originally Posted by SSGNRDZ_28 View Post
    Thanks best bet might be to get one in hand but post some pictures.

    For those interested the rear jack point will clamp to the frame. It will spread the load, allow easier jacking while protecting the pan a bit and will also serve to seal that hole for better aero. It will only protrude slightly below the belly pan.

    108DE4FC-55A7-43BA-A750-7E6F74F4759E.jpg
    That was quick Doug! Put me in for one.

  5. #30
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    569
    Has anyone actually done air Jack's on a gen v?

  6. #31
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481
    Count me in for the jack puck thing Doug. Keep it light!

  7. #32
    I want a Jack Puck!

  8. #33
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona Vipers View Post
    Count me in for the jack puck thing Doug. Keep it light!
    That’s the plan as usual

  9. #34
    Any update on the CF belly pan?

  10. #35
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    More details coming soon.

    C91084F8-A722-4CE1-A8A5-69A562644A79.jpg

  11. #36
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481

  12. #37
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Paradise Valley
    Posts
    5,481
    Quote Originally Posted by kriskyk View Post
    Has anyone actually done air Jack's on a gen v?
    Not that I know of. I'm thinking it'll be a little trickier on ACR's. Are you looking into this? These are the lightest I've found- https://www.apracing.com/product_det...85_family.aspx
    Not sure of the stroke that would be needed, but the longest ones weigh 3 lbs each. Plus all the lines/hardware etc, we are probably looking at close to 30 lbs

  13. #38
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Dana Point
    Posts
    1,690
    AZ, I have Krontec's and according to this link they weight 2.1 lbs each (950 grams). Krontec has lite weight hoses and couplings too, I'd bet their system total weight is maybe 20lbs.

    https://www.hrpworld.com/kro-ll-22-k...roke-supe.html

    Lots' easier to swap wheels, work on brakes etc, then using multiple jacks and jack stands!!

    Air Jacks.jpg

  14. #39
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    569
    Any pics of the frame mounts for the air jack cylinders?

  15. #40
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    Didn't expect the weave to align on all of the ACR E diffuser pieces....

    Weight saved will be over 6 lbs and cost will be less than noted above. More information soon.

    Thanks
    Doug
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #41
    sharmut
    Guest
    Doug, great looking piece.

  17. #42
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas/Phoenix
    Posts
    838
    Very nice!!! How do you think the structural rigidity is compared to the aluminum piece - suspect it is at least as strong. It is hard to tell from the number and types of fasteners FCA used whether or not the belly pan contributes to structural rigidity of the undercarriage. They may have just used the big fasteners to keep the aero forces from sucking the pan off the bottom of the car.

    Pappy

  18. #43
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Doug will that fit a Gen IV?

    Pappy, I believe the fasteners are to keep the belly pan on, not to give the car any structural support.

  19. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Pappy View Post
    Very nice!!! How do you think the structural rigidity is compared to the aluminum piece - suspect it is at least as strong. It is hard to tell from the number and types of fasteners FCA used whether or not the belly pan contributes to structural rigidity of the undercarriage. They may have just used the big fasteners to keep the aero forces from sucking the pan off the bottom of the car.

    Pappy
    I suspect it contributes... as an engineer why wouldnt you use that opportunity to add rigidity? Im pretty sure the Corvettes use the tunnel plate for added stiffness on C5 and newer cars.

  20. #45
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by SRT_BluByU View Post
    I suspect it contributes... as an engineer why wouldnt you use that opportunity to add rigidity? Im pretty sure the Corvettes use the tunnel plate for added stiffness on C5 and newer cars.
    I don't disagree, but I believe it was a biproduct of needing the fasteners to hold the pan on... instead of the fasteners be added for rigidity and also helped keep the pan on.

  21. #46
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    This should fit 2003-2017 cars.

    I don’t believe there’s any major structural rigidly purpose of the pan - the holes in the pan are 0.625” and the screws are only M8 (half that) - that’s not a very good way to keep things from moving around if that was the intention. There’s probably some minor improvement a marketing person could argue but it’s only a 0.062” piece of flexible aluminum.

    Doug

  22. #47
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by SSGNRDZ_28 View Post
    This should fit 2003-2017 cars.

    I don’t believe there’s any major structural rigidly purpose of the pan - the holes in the pan are 0.625” and the screws are only M8 (half that) - that’s not a very good way to keep things from moving around if that was the intention. There’s probably some minor improvement a marketing person could argue but it’s only a 0.062” piece of flexible aluminum.

    Doug
    Mmmmm. Definitely in for a price.

  23. #48
    The pan's are different on Gen V's, I know for certain that the rear diff duct is in a different place. I'm not sure if that would matter but wanted to point that out. Not sure if anything else changed. Also, on Gen III/IVs there is a weldment with threads that all the fasteners bolt to. So the pan doesn't sit flush like it does on Gen V's

  24. #49
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by 1of1TA1.0 View Post
    The pan's are different on Gen V's, I know for certain that the rear diff duct is in a different place. I'm not sure if that would matter but wanted to point that out. Not sure if anything else changed. Also, on Gen III/IVs there is a weldment with threads that all the fasteners bolt to. So the pan doesn't sit flush like it does on Gen V's
    Sad.

  25. #50
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas/Phoenix
    Posts
    838
    Quote Originally Posted by SSGNRDZ_28 View Post
    This should fit 2003-2017 cars.

    I don’t believe there’s any major structural rigidly purpose of the pan - the holes in the pan are 0.625” and the screws are only M8 (half that) - that’s not a very good way to keep things from moving around if that was the intention. There’s probably some minor improvement a marketing person could argue but it’s only a 0.062” piece of flexible aluminum.

    Doug
    Good points. Thanks

    Pappy


 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •