Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1

    interesting to see all these 1 2 mile vipers with aero

    I always thought the base SRTs would make ideal top speed machines. light weight/low drag. But i keep seeing these TT super hp speed machines with ta aero, acr-e aero etc.. what happened to taping all the seams and making the car as slippery as possible.. ?

  2. #2
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    1,183
    Speeds requiring downforce to prevent take off happened

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Zionsville, IN
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by sadil View Post
    Speeds requiring downforce to prevent take off happened
    And apparently still take-off isn’t far away...150CCA34-7FED-463B-80E8-72CF81E1559A.jpg

  4. #4
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    4,803
    Big power cars need traction, and that is what the aero provides.

  5. #5
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M View Post
    Big power cars need traction, and that is what the aero provides.
    ACR-E doesnt make sense to me for a TT 1/2 build.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,889
    The obvious problem is that the OEM ACR down force has to be rebalanced. The front does not have enough down force which is dangerous and also slows the car as the drag coefficent goes up.

  7. #7
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack B View Post
    The obvious problem is that the OEM ACR down force has to be rebalanced. The front does not have enough down force which is dangerous and also slows the car as the drag coefficent goes up.
    Totally agree... ACR/E aero designed for speeds below 170mph. The car isn’t squatting that much from acceleration at 150plus, its squatting due to extremely imbalanced aero at 200mph+. It’s amazing that the rear wing isn’t ripped completely off of there considering the forces a 1200whp ACR hits in the mile. LOL.

  8. #8
    Even the SRT's produce downforce if im not mistaken all the way up to the factory top speed of 208... these 1/2 mile 1000+ hp cars mostly seem to be sub-200mph in the 1/2. would think the lack (or minimization) for drag from the SRTs would be ideal.

  9. #9
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Spring TX
    Posts
    322
    Is this from a launch squat or is this car trying to lift off to the moon during a high speed run.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludington1 View Post
    And apparently still take-off isn’t far away...150CCA34-7FED-463B-80E8-72CF81E1559A.jpg

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by chris_lee View Post
    Is this from a launch squat or is this car trying to lift off to the moon during a high speed run.
    both

  11. #11
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Willow Park, Tx
    Posts
    199

  12. #12
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    North VA
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by chris_lee View Post
    Is this from a launch squat or is this car trying to lift off to the moon during a high speed run.
    It's Dodge's new SpaceX program.

  13. #13
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Micky town
    Posts
    296
    I also believe that the aero works great through the mid 150-170s, but hinder a top speed run.... Basic physics. A better solution, if speed was the only factor, would be a smaller, adjustable wing. Problem is that when someone buys a 175k car and then adds another 100-150k, they wanna look good! Pretty sure they use this car for the coolness factor. Would be intersting, and the question has beenn asked in one of his vids, if he tried a few runs with just taking it off. There is a vid of one in a quarter mile track doing just that. I believe he had great results.
    Some def baddass machines tho! Their coin, let them play! I shall live vicariously through them and youtube! Lol
    Troy

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Lost me beer View Post
    I also believe that the aero works great through the mid 150-170s, but hinder a top speed run.... Basic physics. A better solution, if speed was the only factor, would be a smaller, adjustable wing. Problem is that when someone buys a 175k car and then adds another 100-150k, they wanna look good! Pretty sure they use this car for the coolness factor. Would be intersting, and the question has beenn asked in one of his vids, if he tried a few runs with just taking it off. There is a vid of one in a quarter mile track doing just that. I believe he had great results.
    Some def baddass machines tho! Their coin, let them play! I shall live vicariously through them and youtube! Lol
    Troy
    Best solution. Aftermarket active ACR wing uprights that reduce the downforce as the speed increases. Still looks good and will kill it in the 1/2 mile and road course.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by SRT_BluByU View Post
    I always thought the base SRTs would make ideal top speed machines. light weight/low drag. But i keep seeing these TT super hp speed machines with ta aero, acr-e aero etc.. what happened to taping all the seams and making the car as slippery as possible.. ?
    Everything here is correct, even with the minimal aero of the ta 1.0 it drops it under 200 mph stock. learn from the top speed king bugatti, in its top speed mode the car lowers, retracts the rear ring, and closes all the cars diffuser flaps.

  16. #16
    Eh...you don't really need much aero. Just the proper setup if you are pushing big power. Look at Sal's car. He ran 237 in the 1/2 mile. I think he has a T/A spoiler and a splitter but that's it. he is on 15's though in the back.

  17. #17
    1/2 mi racing is not "top speed" racing for cars with this much power. It's actually an acceleration contest to see how fast you can get to in a fixed distance. That said, the aero does help with traction down low and then trades it off up top, in the 1/2 mi. As it stands, the ACR-E has too much downforce for most speeds, and could absolutely stand to have less rear downforce for something like this.... I think an ACR-E with an Aeromotions style wing would be badass.

    That said, I think starting from a non-aero Viper, reinforcing the decklid/trunk, adding an Aeromotions wing with TA1.0 or TA2.0 front splitters to balance it out would also be a killer setup for even straight-line acceleration contests. At a significant discount to an ACR-E as well.

    Cool stuff.

  18. #18
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    1,786
    For an ACR E I would start with wheel / hood vents removed and wing in position 1. Wonder if it would be possible to put the wing at a negative angle of attack with some adapter or mod. If so you could probably find a decent balance.

  19. #19
    not sure aero does anything for traction.. almost zero effect under 60mph.. i think the stock viper body has negative lift at least to 208mph so not needed top end either. if ya look at the salt flat guys its all streamlining and taped seams.. wish i had the coin to test my theory.. would sure like to see one of these nth moto beast run minus all the add on aero and tapped seams vs. acr-e full aero.. bet the moh difference would be big


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •