Page 14 of 49 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 326 to 350 of 1208
  1. #326
    they just jogging right now, getting their toes wet

  2. #327
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJon View Post
    Ruh Roh
    So they need to find 14 seconds? Not gonna be easy.

  3. #328
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    285
    Live how every other word in the article is "stock" and "bone stock".. Just in case

  4. #329
    Quote Originally Posted by bluesrt View Post
    they just jogging right now, getting their toes wet
    I hardly think running a 7:03 was just a light hearted cruise and taking it easy.

  5. #330
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperDC View Post
    So they need to find 14 seconds? Not gonna be easy.
    14? Thought just 6:57was the target.. Or the lambs 6:52 is still just 12 away

  6. #331
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by bluesrt View Post
    they just jogging right now, getting their toes wet
    I think that is very optimistic thinking....

    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJon View Post
    I hardly think running a 7:03 was just a light hearted cruise and taking it easy.
    Agreed.

  7. #332
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    285
    We really need to wait and see what the team says about how they felt during the Run. Then we'll be able to see if the record is realistic or not

  8. #333
    My guess is it's still a mix condition track with damp patches. When I drove there after light rains, it takes a while for some parts of the track to dry off where the rain pools and in the heavily forested areas where the sun does not hit the pavement.

    Parts of the track that have heavy graffiti get extra super slippery when it's damp too.

    In drier conditions they should be able to shave a decent amount of time off the 7:03. It's just a question of weather cooperating with them for long enough for the track to be fully dry. The Performante had perfect conditions, and I think I read somewhere that they hit the track after a race day, so the track was extra grippy. It'll be tough to match those conditions.

  9. #334
    Agreed. Not worried. A 7:03 matches the lighter ACR-X time of a few years ago if memory serves. Track was green and it was probably a shakedown run probably to test the hubs etc....Can't imagine on a better day it not breaking into the 6:5x.

  10. #335
    Can anyone confirm if they will have any chances for legit passes today or is Fridays "hope window" the only other shot?

  11. #336
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    544
    Quote Originally Posted by 13COBRA View Post
    They really shouldn't have released that article until they hit under 7 seconds considering a Suburu just did a 6:57....

  12. #337
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    891
    a heavily modified race subaru

  13. #338
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,836
    Quote Originally Posted by LABrit View Post
    They really shouldn't have released that article until they hit under 7 seconds considering a Suburu just did a 6:57....
    You can't be serious lol

    That's like running a Formula 1 car out there and say that they shouldn't have released it because a Honda ran 6:18.

  14. #339
    Quote Originally Posted by 13COBRA View Post
    It wasn't easy: the privateers originally scheduled one hour of closed-track lap time on Monday, July 24th, to attempt to set a lap time. But heavy rains all day scuttled those plans, leaving the team only able to practice during open lapping sessions with significant traffic, often under wet, rainy conditions. When a brief window of track time became available this afternoon, the team scrambled into action.

    Road & Track has been traveling with the privateer Viper team in Germany all week. The lap time was set on brand-new, stock, street-legal Kumho Ecsta V720 tires (295/25 front, 355/30 rear on factory 19-inch wheels) supplied by Kumho, a sponsor of the attempt. And this is only the first lap attempt: the team plans to go for another flying lap later this week.
    Not worried, sub 7 min times will come.

  15. #340
    Would be nice to see the data to see where they lost time to the Porsche and Lambo on this run. Would not be surprised if they had dampish sections to contend with.

  16. #341
    7:03 is a warm up- lots more to come

  17. #342
    Quote Originally Posted by LABrit View Post
    They really shouldn't have released that article until they hit under 7 seconds considering a Suburu just did a 6:57....
    You cant be serious comparing an OEM car with another running slicks and WRC engine, trans, suspension etc. If thats the case no one should release any article or timings until they hit less than 6:11 that Stefan Bellof did in 1983 in the Porsche 956 !!

  18. #343
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJon View Post
    I hardly think running a 7:03 was just a light hearted cruise and taking it easy.
    close to it, don't get me wrong, but they have not layed all their cards on the table yet, they are still getting their groove

  19. #344
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Novi, MI
    Posts
    19
    Read somewhere that during the Gen IV ACR's attempt, they knocked off 18 seconds between the first attempted lap and the 3rd attempted lap. 20 seconds by the 5th lap. Definitely think it has more left in it once better conditions arise.

  20. #345
    I read a comment on FB that stuck out to me.

    "They got a mini slot and made a single run... 7.03 beating the new Z06 by 10 sec"

  21. #346
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,280
    "Day 8: After being here 8 days, we got our first lap today. The ACR-E turned at 7:03.45, right out of the box, which is either the second or third fastest production car lap ever recorded at The Ring, depending on whether you believe that the Lamborghini actually turned a 6:51 with no witnesses and irregularities in their video. We are supposed to get a second lap tomorrow, but it's difficult to be assured of anything until it actually happens. If it rains, we're once again sidelined. Dominik reports that he feels that there is a sub 7:00 lap in the car. Trust me when I say that we are doing everything that we can. If we were to return in August, we would need to crowdfund at least another $50,000 for the unplanned expenses. I'm interested in how the Viper Nation feels about that. By the way, "Road & Track" was blown away. I would say they "get it."...


    Yowser

  22. #347
    Quote Originally Posted by ACRucrazy View Post
    I read a comment on FB that stuck out to me.

    "They got a mini slot and made a single run... 7.03 beating the new Z06 by 10 sec"
    Easy with those comparisons...Farnbacher in an ACR E versus a journalist in an unsupported, no data Z06...it's pretty respectable.

  23. #348
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    285
    I guess I'm in the minority because I don't give a shit about the Lamborghini time, but I do want to know what the ACR is capable of. That's what I care about.

    It is what it is. There will always be faster cars.

  24. #349
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegaskid View Post
    I guess I'm in the minority because I don't give a shit about the Lamborghini time, but I do want to know what the ACR is capable of. That's what I care about.

    It is what it is. There will always be faster cars.
    I have never cared. The time that is from an un-proven 2018 model that was a factory test vehicle that ran in 2016?! Come on... really.. LOL

  25. #350
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by ACRucrazy View Post
    I have never cared. The time that is from an un-proven 2018 model that was a factory test vehicle that ran in 2016?! Come on... really.. LOL
    So true...wonder how much independent oversight (journalist, film crew, etc.) was there to chronicle any struggles with the lambo team...guessing none...


 
Page 14 of 49 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •