What is a fair price for one and from whom? Name of a vendor who will paint mine or should I just contact a local paint shop if I go that route?
What is a fair price for one and from whom? Name of a vendor who will paint mine or should I just contact a local paint shop if I go that route?
Here is the real thing:
http://theviperstore.com/Viper5_Prod...nce_Engine.htm
Yes, I am waiting to hear back on a list of parts I sent them....I also sent you a PM about a gas door and some X-Brace bolts..
I listed in parts but I thought I would throw out that I am looking for Left and Right Gen V mirrors. If I could find them in Viper White that would be best but used ones in any color would be ok as I am having them painted Viper White and I want to keep my originals.. Mirrors MUST be complete with stalks and non-chipped/cracked glass.
Last edited by 99Vipers; 05-12-2017 at 06:50 PM.
FYI, this is a purely cosmetic mod, other than saving about 6lbs or something. The OEM metal X Brace is stronger and stiffer.
I bought an OEM brace for $2600.
False. Well documented to be a couple pounds lighter and equivalent stiffness. It's not just some pretty part that they threw together.
http://www.materialstoday.com/compos...iper-wins-spe/
http://papers.sae.org/2013-01-1775/
Last edited by dewilmoth; 05-16-2017 at 03:51 AM.
Let's agree to disagree. Those links are not conclusive. I believe there is contrary information posted somewhere on this site. In any event just get what you're happy with.I have all of the exterior carbon-fiber on my GTS as well as the engine Beauty covers from extreme and door sills. I elected not to get the brace because I believe that the brace takes away stiffness and would make the engine compartment look too busy with the CF engine covers. again each to their own.
Did you not click on the actual SAE paper? Its pretty dang conclusive when the engineers say their requirement going into it's design was equivalent stiffness, haha. Not really sure how thats even debatable, especially when your sole argument is that there is "contrary information posted somewhere on this site." Whether or not a couple pounds savings is worth $3k is a totally different discussion. I'm just pointing out the facts, and if you can show otherwise, I'll happily correct my statement.
Last edited by dewilmoth; 05-16-2017 at 03:51 AM.
On my scale the standard one weighs 5.86 lbs. and the carbon one 3.15 lbs.
I just want to know the difference in the OEM C/F brace and the X-Treme C/F brace besides price???
I think you're referring to this thread, post #20, 30, and 31 = https://driveviper.com/forums/thread...214#post277214
Last edited by cplabaunza; 05-14-2017 at 12:34 AM.
Other than looks, no reason to switch over. Diff in weight is equivalent to one steak dinner.
Standard brace weighs only 5.86 lbs? That's it?
Regardless, even if it was the same weight and less stiff, it looks so much better to run a sexy carbon X across the engine rather than bulky aluminum bands or worse...painted aluminum....then you really have a clown-tastic engine bay.
--Edited--
The SAE paper states the weight at 2.7 kg (5.94 lbs) and the carbon brace being a 50% weight reduction, so right in line with what was measured above. It does also conclude to be similar stiffness.
Last edited by sadil; 05-15-2017 at 10:55 AM.
Correct , there is a reason the metal brace is on an ACR ---- Engineers stated it is stiffer.
But , no argument , I would imagine, as the CB one looks really cool too.
We have ordered plenty for folks, then they have both, and Mark J. has also custom painted a bunch of the metal braces to match the car's paint or design.
Last edited by Bill Pemberton; 05-15-2017 at 02:35 PM.
The carbon fiber brace is 2.7 lbs lighter, not 9 lbs as stated above. I've weighed both.
Also there is no way the carbon fiber version is as stiff as the aluminum one, not because of the material, but because of the design. The carbon fiber piece just has three sides, there's no bottom. It feels very weak to me compared to the aluminum one.
I edited the weights in my post since you guys have obviously weighed both parts. I was just going off the weight savings claimed in the first link I posted. I still find it hard to believe Dodge went to the effort of designing a CF structural part that is less stiff than the part it replaces, but hey, stranger things have happened.
Bookmarks