The downforce is increased from 278 to 400 at 150mph neither is super significant.

Bruce, I'm definitely not downplaying the TA for track as again my point is most won't even reach a normal viper limit. The brakes are outstanding and last long, no wrenching needed and it's great for the track but so is any gen V. I would not buy an acre but I do think it's the dwfinitive choice for a true track purpose viper which was my point.

Vipersrt you misread my sentence. I stated one has to analyze track use and it's costs. Again, if one is going to use as a track vehicle primary it makes sense to go that route. If it's not then people really need to factor in the costs of brakes, tires, etc along with the streetability issues of suspension, etc.

Arguing over what TA is faster is moot because it's down to the driver. 2.0 has slightly better downforce but I wouldn't say it's significant. Suspension is the same. Nowhere have I read or heard anyone mention 2.0 having revised tuning. They are the same car. Same brakes same tires and suspension