Originally Posted by
AZTVR
Look at the original post.
This thread is disgraceful to the OP in my opinion. The issue lies in what EXACTLY was told to the OP. We have no way of knowing what was said and the OP has DELETED his part of the story. That makes me think that he misunderstood and mishandled this situation.
Lots of reasonable, intelligent people here are discussing this situation without knowing the actual facts. Without knowing what was actually agreed upon. Even though the OP deleted his part of the story, it is quoted later on and still there. Note that he did NOT say that Bernie told him that the parts were necessary for the buyer to buy the car. He said that he was told the parts were necessary to complete the sale below the asking price. He did not say that the parts were needed by the buyer or to be transferred to the buyer for free or sold at a discounted price to the buyer or to be sold separately by VE in order to allow them to sell the car below asking price.. There are THREE parties in this sale who need to be financially satisfied with the transaction.
We just do not know what the terms of the contract were.
Bookmarks