I sent the following email to Sergio, Tim, and other senior FCA execs about 20 minutes ago. I just received a call (very quick response) from someone there that told me they are now looking into this issue. He seemed to be genuinely concerned about what was going on. He asked if I could give him the VINs of the cars whose engine warranties have been declined due to the Arrow Controller. Please PM me with your VINs if you have had an engine warranty denied because of the Arrow Controller and I will get back to him. Might not turn into anything but my view has always been that some lower level person in Warranty is making these decisions. I cannot imagine the really senior people would accept the trade offs. The extremely quick response by phone says something.
George
10:13 AM (2 hours ago)
to sergio.marchio., sergio.marchio., Scott.Garberdi., Tim.Kunisk., bob.lee
Dear sir:
I have been a loyal Chyrsler group customer since 1998 when I purchased my first Viper. I currently own three Vipers (2008,2014, and a 2015). I also own a 2015 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon Unlimited, a 2015 Dodge Challenger RT, and I lease a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT/8. Over the years I have owned a total of 7 Vipers, all bought new, and countless Jeeps.
My loyalty to Chrysler is not unusual for Viper owners, in fact it is the norm. Prior to owning my first Viper I would only buy Ford vehicles. The Viper ownership experience coupled with the world wide Viper club changed me into a Chrysler (now FCA) consumer. However recently I have begun to question my continued support of FCA products.
You may know that some Viper owners choose to modify their cars to make them even more personal. Some of the changes are cosmetic while others improve performance. In my case, I added vinyl stripes to my 15 Viper to make it stand out more. Others have changes suspensions or added engine controllers developed by Arrow. Arrow has had a very close working relationship with the Dodge Viper for decades. In fact Dick Winkles, who was formerly SRT's power train engineer now works for Arrow after retiring from SRT. Dick was responsible for engine development in the Generation 5 Viper.
Dick did development work on the revised engine controller while at SRT and was asked by SRT leaders to continue its development when he joined Arrow. This controller is sold by FCA dealers and installed by FCA techs. Dick swears the engine controller is safe for the engine and he should know since he designed both.
As you know there has been a problem with several Viper engines spinning bearings or doing other damage due to debris left over from the manufacturing process. The R28 customer care program was created in an attempt to identify engines that had debris in them. Unfortunately it was not a foolproof test and some engines continued to fail after they passed R28. As a result FCA extended warranty coverage for all cars effected by R28. Although it is not clear to many of us Viper owners whether R28 actually covered all cars with potential issues. For the most part FCA has replaced these engines under warranty although getting warranty approval often has taken weeks.
Recently three engines have failed in cars owned by Viper club members and their warranties have been denied because there was a mismatch between the mileage on the odometer and the engine controller (PCM). FCA states this is because they had the Arrow controller installed and that it caused the engine to fail. Many techs and engineers (including Dick Winkles) have examined the bearings and have concluded the failed due to debris in the block. When bearings fail they leave telltales as to the nature of the failure. The Arrow controller did not cause these engines to fail.
The Magnusson-Moss Act prohibits manufacturers from denying warranty claims due to aftermarket parts unless they can show the aftermarket part caused the failure in question. In these cases this has not been done. In fact because of known issues with the Viper block as evidenced by the R28 program, the addition of a new block cleaning station at CAAP, and the fact that bone stock engines are failing in the exact same way every Viper owner knows the controller was not involved in the failure.
None the less, FCA's refusal to honor the engine warranty when they know the failure was caused by debris leftover from the manufacturing process is disheartening to all of us Viper owners regardless of whether our cars have failed or whether they have been modified. I am fortunate in that my engines appear to be good but many, many people are concerned over the problems our "Viper Brothers' are having.
Given the warranty denials several folks have now cancelled orders for other FCA products including Vipers, Jeeps and Rams. I myself am now debating an upgrade to an ACR but I too am worried that FCA will look for any reason to deny a warranty claim. This is so unlike the Chrysler company we used to know, a company that treated their top customers well. Viper owners have been some of Chrysler's top customers and now because of the decisions of some lower level warranty manager much of this is being called into question.
FCA would have been better off fixing the three engines that were denied warranty work as a customer accommodation especially since there is no proof the Arrow controller had anything to do with the failure. This would be like saying my vinyl stripes added too much weight to the car and caused the engine to fail. Now all that has happened is that FCA is losing orders on new cars and getting people to sell existing vehicles. Through FCA's action the value of our purchases has also dropped materially. I want to reiterate that those folks that chose to install an Arrow controller did so based on the recommendation of an FCA dealer. There was never an indication that FCA would suddenly not stand behind the warranty on the engine when everyone knows the controller had nothing to do with the failures. I truly feel bad for those folks.
I am writing you to bring these issues to your attention. Most of us Viper owners want FCA to exceed but we are afraid recent actions taken on warranties are putting our relationships at risk and is driving the value of the cars we love down the tubes. If you think I have over stated this you can read much of this on the Viper club's website "driveviper.com". There are countless threads with some pretty upset current and future FCA customers. Someone should look into this at a senior level and to the right thing.
Thanks for listening,
George Bxxxxxxx
Bookmarks