Andy, Thanks for posting that.
So, Reshetov's situation sounds the same and ACRSteve's situation with the backlight sounds similar.
I can picture the engineers and management saying, "WTF is going on?? I thought that we had implemented effective corrective actions for these issues? Are these new issues escapes from the corrective actions or are they because of new root causes? How do we know that the replacement we would send out is any better than the failed assembly? What about our product on the production line? We need to get a handle on this, NOW !"
I believe that most probably the engineers are trying to figure out what is going on. If it were me, I would not approve sending out a $20,000 or $5000 assembly that was just as suspect as the one that failed. I worked for many years as an engineer whose responsibilities included failure analysis, root cause, and corrective action determination and implementation.
I understand that that rationale is not what the owners want to hear. They would rather have their car back on the road immediately even if it wasn't fixed with a known good part.
Bookmarks