Me and a friend were arguing about cars vs motorcycle around a track. We found the lap record at laguna seca for a motorcycle is 1'20.7 and in world super bike with a 1'21.568. I know that that is a all out racing bike for the former and a fairly high modified one for the latter but I have always heard that cars are much better around a track. Then we started to argue about what could be done to make the acr faster. Im pretty certain that both of the bikes times were set with qualifying tires so you can put those on the car. The tires that come on the acr are amazing as we all know but you can't really compare them to a tire that is designed to only last for 2-3 laps or so. The tires could get you what 1-2 seconds? Or am I way off with that estimation? Next is the driver. Randy Pobst lapped laguna seca in 1'28.65. While randy is an amazing driver you also cant compare him so someone who is actively racing the same bike over and over every week because randy only gets a limited amount of time with each car. On that note why did they get Randy to lap the car a laguna and not the factory driver? Would he not have done even better since he knows the car perfectly? So add maybe another 1-2 seconds with the best of the best drivers like the ones on the bikes that set the records? Or again am I off here? Last major thing i could think of is power. The acr puts it power down flawlessly and then some. It could easily handle a great deal more. I think it would help greatly given how much its downforce affects high end acceleration as made obvious in the much lower top speed than the base viper. Maybe in the 900 range or maybe even 1000? Its just puts it down so well with the tires and downforce. So a couple seconds there.
So do you thing all of this would add up to a as good or better lap time than the bikes? Or are we going to have to start shedding weight like the bikes do?
Bookmarks